Home Blog Page 225

Vikings win the first game of season series

0

Sophomore infielder Raul Gonzalez was the first one to bring it home for the Vikings, as the Long Beach City College baseball team won 9-3 against visitor Compton College.

Gonzalez improved from his last appearance against Santa Ana College, Gonzales ended with two runs in total against Compton, where he had no runs against Santa Ana.

“It’s all about just improving and fixing my mistakes overtime, and I know my teammates and coaches are here to help me out,” Gonzales said.

Freshman outfielder Zach Rivas was right behind Gonzales, as he was the only other player to have two runs in the game.

Sophomore pitcher Garrett Rennie had a better game than average, Rennie had 9 strikeouts against the Tartars and no home runs

“I really have to keep my focus for the rest of the season. I think that’s what brought us here, having our focus as our priority,” Rennie said.  

The Tartars were having trouble the entirety of the game, sophomore left hand pitcher Kevin Smith had six base on balls.

“We have two more games against Long Beach so I’m not completely worried, but if we want to be better, it has to start with me,” Smith said.

According to Vikings Head Coach Casey Crook, the Vikings need to work on their decisions in the infield, as the team had missed opportunities during the game.

The Vikings are set to play the Tartars two more times, and Head Coach Martinez plans to win them all and to go as far as possible in the conference.

“We are capable of going as far as possible in the conference it because I’ve been in these situations many times,” Martinez said.

“We need to run less people and we have to our infield catchers focused. But it also really depends who we play, that’s the uncertainty I have for our future.”

The Vikings increase their overall record to 25-13, and 16-4 in the South Coast Conference.

The Vikings are set to play Compton College again, and one more time after that, the next game will be at Compton College on today at 2:30 p.m.

Sign for anti-hate rally defaced the week leading up to the event

0

A sign advertising the anti-white supremacy rally located on the intersection of Carson Street and Bellflower Boulevard has been defaced, and the culprits are unknown at this time.

The rally, which is supposed to take place this weekend, is a response to a planned far-right rally that is set to take place at Bluff Park on Sunday at 10 a.m.

The original version of the flyer was posted by the Party for Socialism and Liberation, or PSL, and even though the group doesn’t appear to be a part of the original planners for the anti-hate rally, the sign they placed at the intersection seems to indicate their involvement to some level.

The sign was defaced in the last 24 hours, and it’s not immediately clear who is responsible, though based on what was changed on the sign it was likely done by a pro-white person who believes that the counter rally on Sunday is anti-white as opposed to anti-white supremacy.

It is unclear at this time if the far-right rally is still going to take place, however the counter rally is still taking place whether the far-right shows up or not.

Board Editorial: Students should be required to learn about financial literacy

LBCC should require its students to take financial literacy classes to help them better manage their money.

During college years, students can face many financial burdens from facing credit card debt to taking out student loans, students are left with this weight on their shoulders because they’re not sure how to manage their money wisely.

Regardless, if the student is a first-time or returning college student a financial literacy class will be an asset for them when transfering to a four-year university, or even after the completion of community college, it can be difficult if students don’t have the guidance needed to achieve financial security.

To graduate or transfer from LBCC, students must complete a certain amount of courses according to the Area E: Life Long & Self Development on Plan B, there are 17 available courses that students can choose from that educate students about life skills that could be helpful later on in life.

Additionally, all courses in Area E are essential, but learning how to properly manage finances is something that would be crucial to prevent students from dealing with financial burdens if the possibility ever presented itself.

For example, how people understand what credit loans are, or knowing the difference between renting and buying a home that could be taught when taking a financial literacy class.

LBCC offers a personal finance management class as a general education course on Plan B, but only offers one of those classes on campus and the rest online, with only one professor teaching those courses, as well as it not being a requirement for students to take.

Plan B, which is aimed to help students successfully transfer to a California State University, is the only plan that offers a personal finance management course (GBUS 10) as a general education option.

Plan A, which is LBCC General Education, and Plan C, which is Intersegmental General Education Transfer Curriculum (IGETC), do not offer GBUS 10 as a general ed.

Even though it may be a bit of a challenge incorporating the financial literacy classes in all of the general education plans, it should be done, and LBCC should make it a priority to do so.

According to Professor Nick Carbonaro, he is the only faculty member to teach personal finance management on campus, he agrees that having to take this course as a requirement will be beneficial to students.

The possible benefits of having a personal finance management class should make it even more of a priority for LBCC to make it a required general education course.

With having personal finance management as a requirement a potential increase in enrollment, faculty hiring, and value of the course. As a result to this, more on campus classes and more options of when and where to take the class will be offered.

The far-right and an activist coalition to protest in Long Beach

0

Correction: A change was made to the title of this article to better reflect the groups involved with the two rallies.

The Bluff Park neighborhood in Long Beach, known for being a quiet neighborhood with little crime, is expected to be the site of a far-right rally, but that has not gone unnoticed by citizens who have already mobilized a counter protest and plan to meet the far right protesters head on in an effort to push them back out of Long Beach.

The initial rally is scheduled to take place at Bluff Park and was originally announced by the United Patriot Nationalist Front, or UPNF.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has dubbed the UPNF a hate group, and points out its ties with Antonio Foreman, a white nationalist activist who marched in Charlottesville at the Unite the Right rally.

When the event for the rally went public on Facebook, many citizens in the city were quick to condemn it, and some formed a coalition of sorts, the Long Beach United Anti-Racist Neighborhood Front, and along with the Long Beach chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America have formed a counter rally called “No White Nationalism in Long Beach.”

One of the original commenters on the event announcement page on Facebook, Brian Addison was very clear on who he thought the group represented, and how he felt about them in Long Beach.

“This, Long Beach should not be dismissed. White supremacists and ultra-nationalists are using our city as a stage,” Addison said.

After the counter rally was announced, UPNF have appeared to change their tactics by first changing their name to Everything Patriot and Tactical.

Which may be temporary because their Facebook page banner and profile picture still contain UPNF insignia.

After the name change, EPAT have also erased, or made private, the event on social media, which has lead members of the counter rally to speculate that the far right group has decided not to hold their rally in Long Beach after all.

According to their Facebook page, The Long Beach United Anti-Racist Neighborhood Front have decide to hold their counter rally anyway, and if the far right rally doesn’t show up, then the Neighborhood Front will consider it a victory.

Many of the business owners in Retro Row, Downtown, or the Bluff Park area of Long Beach either hadn’t heard of the rally, or had only heard of it through passing conversation.

But most of them maintained that far right rhetoric regarding immigration and sanctuary cities would not play well in Long Beach.

Sidney Cramer, owner of Spa Sidney in Bluff Park summed up the common sentiment in a brief phrase, “Those groups don’t really have any business here,” said Cramer referring to the far right groups holding the initial rally.

The Long Beach Police Department has been made aware of the rally and counter rally, but for now have no plans on increasing patrols in the area.

“We are aware of the rally but at this time, we are not increasing patrols in the area. We encourage all members of our community to express their first amendment rights peacefully,” said Officer Jennifer De Prez while giving a prepared statement to the media.

The office of the third district of Long Beach Councilwoman, Suzie Price, who’s district contains most of Bluff Park, have also been made aware of the rallies.

Price holds a similar view as the LBPD, that peaceful expressions of first amendment rights are preferred for all who attend the rallies.

The rally in Long Beach follows a day after another planned rally in Huntington Beach by another far right group, “March to END Sanctuary State”, and that rally too is to be met with resistance in the form of counter rally called, “All Out to Oppose Hatred & White Supremacy”.

According to the rally’s social media page, it is being hosted by Occupy ICE LA, a group that fights against what they consider to be negative policy from ICE and the Trump administration, and Indivisible OC, a group dedicated to holding their values during the years of Trump’s presidency.

Arthur Schaper, a local far right activist is a planned speaker at the far right event in Huntington Beach.

Schaper is well known in Southern California for showing up to town hall or city council meetings and disrupting them with either anti-immigration or anti-sanctuary city rhetoric, which has seen him arrested on a few occasions.

Both rallies are expected to occur on the last weekend in the month of April, with the Huntington Beach rally happening on April 27, and the Long Beach rally happening on the following day on April 28.

Students march to raise awareness about sexual assault

0

“However we dress, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no.” This is one of the many chants yelled by students marching against sexual violence on April 22 at LAC.

The event “Take Back The Night March” was hosted by the Sexual Assault Awareness Month student committee.

It began with opening remarks from Andrea Rodriguez, a student on the committee and a survivor, with her giving some time before the march to create posters.

About 10 people participated in the event including students who were on the committee and the march began at the E quad at noon and went through the main center of LAC until 1 p.m.  

Sexual awareness month goes through all of April and all month the student committee and student health services will bring awareness to sexual violence, prevention, and abuse.

According to one of the informational flyers being given out, approximately 1 in 5 women have been victims of sexual assault in college as well as 1 in 16 men.

They gave out wristbands, flashlights, flyers with information about sexual assault, and informational cards giving information on what consent means.

Sylvia Garcia, the advisor for the SAAM committee, gave insight into why she feels these events are important.

“A lot of our survivors, the events happen in their own personal lives, in their own communities, it happens everywhere, it just comes to light being in sexual assault awareness month people become aware … as we do these events people kind of open up about their experiences … it’s an impactful thing that happens to them, it takes a long time to heal, and some people don’t deal with it, so with events like this it kind of helps them move toward talking to someone about it,” Garcia said.

Sexual violence is any type of unwanted sexual contact and any form of action that is unwanted can be uncomfortable and leave an impact that can last for years.

Andrea Rodriguez, who also had an uncomfortable encounter explains what happened to her.

“I was in the women’s locker room, on the other side of campus, just getting ready for my day, and then I was in the gym right by the pool area so there’s like an entrance right there and then like there was a guy that came in and he was like fully naked, like his penis was erected and it was so weird, personally for me it was shocking, like did this really happen,” Rodriguez said.

Shera Hawbaker, a student who heard of the event through the NordicSync event website for LBCC says she participates because, “I’ve known people who have suffered with sexual violence, both genders, so I like that this march is open to everyone and I just wanted to be a part of it, I think that it is important to get involved.”

Many people are victims of sexual violence and abuse, if you or anyone you know is in harm’s way, student health services can help, with offices located at both LAC and PCC.

The ASB elections are coming, and three of the five candidates are uncontested

0

Correction: A change was made to better reflect the percentage of people who participated in last year’s ASB elections.

Colorful campaign posters hung up on every major bulletin board and wall throughout LBCC means one thing, the 2019-2020 Associated Student Body general elections, which will start on April 23.

ASB is a form of student government here at LBCC, whose members are known to join with the hopes of learning leadership skills that will help them in their future endeavors.

The student run organization is delegated to represent the student body, and plays a key role in the disbursement funds amongst the different programs and clubs that LBCC offers.

“Every program that ASB supports is very important, from athletics to the arts. I don’t want one program to be left out,” Jan Paolo Canteras said, the ASB 2018-2019 president.

Candidates will have to meet the minimum requirements of being enrolled at LBCC for at least one year, completing six academic credit units, and maintaining at least a 2.5 GPA, this year’s election will have five candidates.

Alyssa Jones and Ian Rubinstein will go head to head for the ASB presidential position.

However, with no one to run against them, Kindyl Tisby, running for LAC vice president, Donnell Jones, running for student trustee, and Cesar Fierro, running for secretary, will automatically be appointed to their desired positions.

Despite the college having over 24,000 students enrolled, just over 1% of the student body actually voted during the last ASB elections.

Canteras won the 2018-2019 elections with 293 votes.  

Canteras has acknowledged that voter turnout has been very low and set up a game plan to increase the student-voter turnout.

One plan was to market the election early on and to bring student awareness by putting up posters all throughout campus, and teaming up with the school’s communication department to email out important election dates to the student body.

“I am busy with work and school so I don’t have time to run for student office here, not to say that I don’t care about Long Beach City College, but a university is way more important. If I ran there, I would have more opportunities,” said Mayura Kong, full-time student.

More students shared similar ideals.

“If I didn’t sit in front of the E building today, I would not know there was an election,” said Brian Lopez, Pre-Bio major.

“The posters don’t do anything, people just walk past without even reading, they should make voting mandatory, then there would be a good turnout.”

“I don’t think emails would help, I rather the candidates be more around and in the mix, maybe not come to class, but make themselves more known,” said Daisy Salazar, who is currently taking general education courses.

“If I were to vote, I have no idea who I’m voting for. I think we should see a video of the candidates so that way we can see their personality, how much they really care.”

Canteras spoke about implementing a new policy for candidates to run for presidency.

With Canteras new policy, candidates running for president would need to have 500 signatures from their constituents.

Canteras believes this will increase student interaction and get them involved in the election.

“The ideal candidate is all about learning and investing in students. You have to talk to your constituents and represent them on all levels” said Canteras.

ASB held a candidate meet and greet where candidates would give speeches and introduce themselves to the student body.

But out of the 15 students that showed up, a majority of them were close friends and family to the candidates.

Along with the rest of the student body, by the time the event started, presidential candidate Rubinstein, was also not present.

Cantreras advises that the new president should stay organized and never do anything half-hearted.

Posters were displayed the day before the election around campus, and will give students information on where and how to vote.

Voting closes on April 25 at 10 p.m., to cast your vote, visit http://asbelections.lbcc.edu/?eID=1.

LinkedIn Learning is a new resource for professors to help their students succeed

0

LinkedIn Learning is coming all across California as a state initiative funded by the state to community colleges and is taking a focus on the Los Angeles Community College District.

LinkedIn is best known for people looking for jobs and employers looking for candidates of those jobs.

With LinkedIn Learning students can earn online badges and certificates to those prospective jobs and help students achieve goals.

LinkedIn bought Lynda.com which has now become LinkedIn Learning today.

Career Coach and LinkedIn Administrator Francia H. Pena, teamed up with Nick Carbonaro professor of business administration and economic department to present LinkedIn Learning to faculty at LBCC.

Carbonaro planned a workshop for faculty called, “LinkedIn Learning: How to Create a Level Economic Playing Field through LinkedIn.”

A classroom filled with faculty members learned about what LinkedIn Learning is and how faculty can get LinkedIn Learning in their classrooms.

Pena explained to the faculty in the workshop the importance of what LinkedIn Learning can offer to faculty and their students.

“Faculty can invite their students to the platform and group them into categories to suggest videos and courses related to their classes,” Pena said.

LinkedIn Learning is $30 a month, but faculty were able to get LinkedIn Learning for free, and through faculty, give it for free to their students.

According to Carbonaro, this will be the first semester that LBCC is starting with LinkedIn Learning.

This workshop was specifically targeted to faculty, for faculty can give their students more resources to succeed.

Gene Carbonaro, dean of career technical education at LBCC, was in attendance with Anthony Pagan, associate dean of career technical education to show their support.

“It’s a more structured education platform so, I’m sure there’s statistics out there as far as students going onto youtube to access various tutorial videos to teach them set skills, but now with LinkedIn Learning you have a structured environment where if I’m pursuing a particular set of skills or competency that it is in a format I don’t have to go searching for,” Pagan said.

A couple of faculty members explained what they liked about the workshop they attended.

John Sicklick, part-time professor of computer office studies said, “I think it is a great opportunity for students … Life management can help students get jobs.”

Gerard Greenidge, part-time professor of career technical education said, “Gives students the opportunity to learn on their own.”

According to Pena, it is up to faculty to share with their students the value of the platform and what it has to offer.

The LinkedIn Learning workshop has opened up a new way for faculty to help students achieve their education goals.  

Letter to the Editor: Birth control can be lifesaving for people that have severe conditions

0

Hello,

I am writing this letter in response to an opinion piece from April 2, 2019 titled “Educating people on the negative effects of birth control.” I truly have no ill intent, but I hope to enlighten readers to a few points I believe were overlooked.

First, I wish to stress that not only women use birth control. Many non-binary people, intersex people, and transgender men use various forms of birth control. Unless this article was intended specifically for cisgender women, I believe more inclusive language would have been beneficial because the effects listed can also affect much of these populations.

Secondly, hormonal birth control is prescribed for number of serious, chronic heath conditions like endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. For people with these disorders, myself included, hormonal birth control is often the only treatment available and can be lifesaving because of the severe physical and psychological symptoms these conditions cause, despite the possible side effects and risks that the treatments may carry.

An additional note is that two types of cancer mentioned in the article whose risks are reduced by oral contraceptives have lower survival rates than those which have a heightened risk, meaning that oral contraceptives may actually lower the user’s risk of more dangerous cancers in exchange for less dangerous types.

Although I agree that patients should be more informed when being prescribed contraceptives, they typically do come with information about the medication which includes the risks and side effects. I feel that it is the patient’s responsibility to read over that information and let it influence their decision.

Overall, I think this is a great conversation to have. I just wish it had been more informed and inclusive.

Thank you,

Kylie-Sky Lindsey, Student

Letter to the Editor: Many working single parents do not qualify for the care program

0

I read the article “LBCC provides support for single parents” and I felt the need to respond to the article. 

I am a recent student from LBCC I have successfully transfered to UC Merced. As an LBCC student I was an advocate for parenting students. I advocated for the much needed breast feeding facilities with my fellow parenting student Lara Meintjes and the school met us half way with the room that is occasionally available upon request in the health center. It is not promoted and there are no signs. It is in violation of title 9. 

As a single parent in LBCC I did not qualify for the care program it is only for students that are parents, that receive cash aid. Many working single parents such as myself do not qualify for the program. EOPS is a great program that I was grateful to have but it is not a program made for parenting students. Children are strictly not allowed to EOPS councilor meetings. I found it difficult to make all 3 of my meetings every semester.

I struggled to get through LBCC as a single parent, with limited recourses, to successfully transfer to a UC. I got through it without the only recourse that is made for students that are parents. I worked full time and I was a full time student. I would just appreciate it if other single parents wouldn’t receive false hope. I feel that it should be clarified that the breast feeding “facility” does not meet title 9, that it is not readily accessible, the care program qualifications should be made clear, and the EOPS program does not put the needs of Parenting student’s first.

Darlene Medrano, Alumni

Letter to the Editor: The lactation room at LBCC doesn’t meet the minimum legal standards set in CA

0

As a Long Beach City College student, and a parent, I was pleased to see the Viking News sharing resources available to parenting students on campus through Sabriyya Ghanizada’s article last week, but felt the assertion that our administration is “supporting single parents” to be somewhat disingenuous when our campus resources fail to meet the bare minimum legal standards set within CA. As Long Beach City College does not collect data on parenting students I cannot state definitively what percentage of our students are parents but my own 40 class survey last spring indicated that about 18% of our students have dependents. If this number remains similar across a larger institutional study (which I strongly urge the administration to conduct) that will indicate that our parenting population, even at almost 1/5 of our 34986 students, makes up a smaller proportion of our overall student population than the national average which a study by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research in 2014 places at 26% of all college students nationwide. The “Mother’s Room” advertised within the article is available only during the Student Health Center’s operating hours, while state law (AB2785) clearly demands that “the lactation accommodation shall be available to a student whenever a student is required to be present on campus” which indicates that our lactation facilities must be available between the hours of 6:40am and 9:50pm on weekdays, and from 8:00am to 2:00pm on Saturdays as our campuses offer classes during these periods. This facility also fails to be featured on campus maps, on the college website, or on signage in the relevant locations.

At the federal level, Title IX “prohibits discrimination against a student based on pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery from any of these conditions.” And further requires that educational institutions “must excuse a student’s absences because of pregnancy or childbirth for as long as the student’s doctor deems the absences medically necessary. When a student returns to school, she must be allowed to return to the same academic and extracurricular status as before her medical leave began.” And yet LBCC do not have an established parental leave policy, nor do many of our professors seem aware of these regulations or of their impact on their classes, particularly where attendance and participation grades, or issuance of incompletes are concerned. As long as these policies are left at the discretion of faculty, LBCC risks running afoul of federal regulations. We need clear, unambiguous policy measures to close these gaps.  

Beyond lactation facilities and lecture halls, our parenting-students face hurdles in the counseling offices; have you ever noticed the line on the EOPS counseling sheet that says “do not bring children with you to the counseling appointment, or you will have to reschedule” – many of our low-income students are required to attend these appointments three times every semester. This is on top of studying full-time, parenting, and – in most cases – working to support a family. This clause, and the shaming “no children allowed” signs in the counseling center, burden these students with the additional responsibility of finding and paying for childcare so that they may attend their very necessary academic counseling appointments. Long Beach City College policy (5012.3 F) officially states that no children are allowed on campus unsupervised, surely the supervision of their parent and caregiver should suffice?

The LBCC Child Development Centers are wonderful facilities, providing stellar care to the children of students and community members. Their services, however, are restricted to children between the ages of 2 and 5, which is unlikely to coincide with the population requiring our lactation facilities. The resources Ms. Ghanizada described should certainly be appreciated as they demonstrate efforts to improve the lives of student-parents, and should be applauded as they indicate the presence of concerned administrators in many departments on campus but a coordinated effort would go a long way towards achieving equity for parenting-students.  A thorough assessment, by the administration, of this population on our campus would help to close these gaps, to identify areas of weakness and to better serve our students, who face obstacles at every turn and still persist. The resources that LBCC is offering indicate a piece-meal approach to supporting these students and clearly demonstrate the need for a broader universal assessment of who our parenting students are, and what their needs are. A student making use of the lactation facilities is probably a different student to the one who enrolls their 2-5 year old in campus child care, and the low income EOPS student attending a counseling appointment is unlikely to be able to pay for child care to enable them to attend their appointment. Our administration could close these gaps and provide active, engaged support for parenting students if they started by gathering data, listening to these students and assessing where similar local community colleges are succeeding in meeting the needs of their parenting student populations.

Other campuses in the Southern California region are making changes big and small to aid these students and help them to reach their transfer and career goals and thus provide better lives for their families and I don’t believe our college is doing enough. LA Valley College offer a Family Resource Center that boasts a “whole-family” approach to education. They offer “an academic counselor, after school (school-age) childcare, kid-friendly study lounge, tutoring, textbook support, computer and printing access, school supplies, children’s clothing exchange, organic produce, diapers/wipes/formula, and so much more” (lavcfamilyresourcecenter.org). Cerritos College recently extended their childcare hours to offer evening care for children between the ages of 3 and 5, they also offer resource workshops for parenting students where they explain their rights under Title IX and similar statutes, map out available resources on campus and in the community and share information about the parenting classes that are available to their students. Rio Hondo recently piloted a parenting-student graduation in conjunction with their CalWorks program and Mothers of Color in Academia, a campus advocacy group.

The efforts of community colleges to support parenting populations result in extraordinary rewards not just for our students and their families but for our colleges and broader communities. Research has shown us that parenting-student resources can dramatically affect the retention, completion and general success rates of students with dependents. In their 2009 book, Passing the Torch: Does Higher Education for the Disadvantaged Pay Off Across the Generations? Paul Attewell and David E. Lavin explored, through multi-generational research, the consequences of educational attainment for families. They found that “increasing parents’ educational attainment yields positive short and long-term gains for children, in the form of higher earnings, greater access to resources, more involvement in their child’s education and greater likelihood of their child pursuing a higher educational degree.” Children growing up in households where education is valued are not only far more likely to seek higher education themselves, they are far more prepared for the inherent challenges of higher-ed when they reach college age.

 It is our responsibility as LBCC students to both applaud the administration for their efforts, as Ms. Ghanizada did, and to hold them accountable when they aren’t doing enough to support their students, and to meet the requirements set by state and federal authorities. It is incumbent upon us to make our voices heard, to demonstrate our presence on campus and to communicate our needs to the administration. I understand how difficult it is to find time to keep fighting while juggling the demands of school, work, and parenting, but if we work together – sharing the responsibility, we can amplify one-another’s voices and leave this campus a better place for future students too.

Lara Meintjes, Student